User:MattieMetts683

From CCCWiki
Revision as of 12:12, 29 March 2013 by 37.59.179.229 (talk) (Created page with "What company helps make the most effective pure water systems? That's a good question. Should you listen to the advertising campaigns, you would think that each company provides ...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

What company helps make the most effective pure water systems? That's a good question. Should you listen to the advertising campaigns, you would think that each company provides a pure water system, but there really isn't much "truth" in advertising.

First, there is a question concerning the true definition of purity. If you used the definition of "free of anything different", you might end up with pure water systems that de-mineralize. Reverse osmosis, for example. But, minerals are good for our overall health.

アルピナ 水

If you use the definition "free of contaminants", you would possess a pure water system that removes hazardous chemicals, lead and chlorine-resistant cysts. This is the kind of pure water system which i want. Briefly, here's why those things ought to be removed and just how it is possible, without de-mineralizing.

Chemicals

According to the Ralph Nader Research Group, there are 2400 different chemicals contained in publicly treated supplies and the majority of them are human carcinogens. Regulating agencies like the US Environmental Protection Agency has built "safe" levels for many of them, but not all.

The safe levels were determined by assuming that there was only one carcinogen inside your glass at a moment. Additionally they assumed that every individual weighs at least 175 pounds. Scientists have warned that these two assumptions are dangerous. They are saying that the existence of two or more chemicals exponentially increases their toxicity.

So, now, regulating agencies have "goal" levels, which are often zero, but facilities rarely, if ever, achieve those goals. Review your local "Consumer Confidence Report" to check out things like TTHMs, if you want proof.

Pure water systems that include a carbon and multi-media block will remove nearly all traces of these chemicals. Read product performance data, to be sure. The best companies supply the data on their websites.

Lead

Lead is a hazardous heavy metal that is additionally a naturally occurring substance. It's contained in surface and groundwater. Aging pipelines have lead solder at the joints and because the water passes by those joints, it absorbs some traces of that lead. Older homes have older pipes, for prone to have lead linings. Chlorine eats away at the lead and even more enters your home.

A pure water system which includes an ion exchange step will remove a lot more than 99% of all traces from the heavy metal and rock, in addition to traces of copper, which are not particularly hazardous, but do affect the taste.

Chlorine-resistant Cysts

Pure water systems which include submicron filtration can remove chlorine-resistant cysts. These contaminants cause illnesses that can be fatal to infants, small children, the elderly and people with weakened immune-systems.

So, all together a pure water system for that home should include a multi-media block, with a submicron sized porous structure as well as an ion exchange step. These simple steps improve the taste and healthfulness, without having affected any naturally sourced mineral content.

Advertising for pure water systems could be confusing, however you know the reality. Hopefully, that clears some misconception.